“It is wrong to keep animals as pets” by Roman Kremer Although many people in the world enjoy animals on PREPOSITION their houses, nowadays people are choosing to letting GRAMMAR them go. They think that if they have them in their homes, only humans enjoy GRAMMAR. I agree with this GRAMMAR people so I put my little fish on the ocean LANGUAGE. First of all, if animals are locked they will not be happy because they will not be free, they need to move, they need space! some people that agree with this idea don´t go to the zoo because don´t like to see animals locked. Another people say that there are animals to be with humans ???, and there are animals to be in the jungle, not like pets THIS IS NOT ENGLISH. The most normal VOCABULARY pets are dogs and cats. And I agree that they can be with humans, but not in an appartament, they need a house, with a courtyard. Some opponents say that humans are the rulers of the world so they can do whatever they want. And they don´t think in the animals. They also say that animals can´t talk so they cannot think what they want, so they do whatever they want. I really desagree SPELLING with them, if you are with a dog you can understand him GRAMMAR very well, GRAMMAR is not a human but GRAMMAR is an animal that is a very good friend to PREP us. And they WHO? have on PREP their homes snakes (in a cage), rabbits and toads, for example, just for fun. In conclusion, although a lot of people like enjoy animals on their houses, I believe that we have to think on them. There are few exceptions, like dogs and cat, but I think that they were born to be with us. WERE THEY?
TOO SIMPLE LINKING DEVICES
If cows were de dominant species, the would eat us
Humans have a highly developed brain, capable of abstract reasoning, language, introspection, and saving problems. Animals GRAMMARnot reason or progress, they don’t solve problems they learn more or less mechanically or through the experience. Because of that cows might not be the dominant specie, so it GRAMMAR animals couldn't eat humans at first instance. BUT THE POINT IS WHETHER THEY WOULD EAT US IN CASE THEY WERE THE DOMINANT SPECIES, NOT IF THEY COULD EVER BE THE DOMINANT SPECIES.
One point of view, is that if cows were the dominant species of the planet, they would probably need more energy and sources in order to survive. So a group of people believe that maybe they would eat us. One thing to take on account is that besides needing energy, the cows would probably do what most of the humans do to survive nowadays, killing cows in order to eat meet, so probably cows would want to kill and eat humans too. This is why many people strongly believe we ought to reconsider if killing these animals is the right thing to do, because we could perfectly survive eating just vegetables.
Other point of view is that the hypothesis of the preceding paragraph is impossible because an animal can’t think or speak; there is no way to think that animals will dominate us. This idea doesn’t make sense. Animals have a lot of abilities for example there is a fact that some animals are very sensitive to sound, temperature, touch but also there is a big difference between animals and Humans.
But in my opinion, I think they would not eat us because they don’t haveTENSEthe need to. They could keep feeding themselves with the same food they eat now. Nicolas Argerich
Adolescence: the happiest or unhappiest time in most people’s lives.
Everyone agree with the thought that adolescence is a moment of changes. Teenagers have some adult's behavior and they also have child's behavior. In general teenagers have few responsibilities, such as going to school and some other activity, and so much free time. In addition to this: in adolescence we fall in love for the first time in our lives.
There are some several advantages. Firstly, the teenagers don’t have experience of life. When they want to do something is an experiment because they don’t know how the best way is. For example, when they start to work, they do wrong the activities. Another point is that always they are dissatisfied, they are never happy, they use to want all the things that they haven't, and not to value those that they do. To sum up, they are very problematic.
However, there are many arguments against these. Firstly, teenagers don’t have economic obligations; in general parents give them a monthly payment for they to use it. Secondly, they can go out all the time with friends, their family or their love because they have lot of free time. This is incredible.
In conclusion, the adolescence is for enjoy, this moment of the life is great. The teenagers have to do their obligations and they have to enjoy the life absolutely.
Juan
“It is wrong to keep animals as pets” by Roman Kremer
Although many people in the world enjoy animals on PREPOSITION their houses, nowadays people are choosing to letting GRAMMAR them go. They think that if they have them in their homes, only humans enjoy GRAMMAR. I agree with this GRAMMAR people so I put my little fish on the ocean LANGUAGE.
First of all, if animals are locked they will not be happy because they will not be free, they need to move, they need space! some people that agree with this idea don´t go to the zoo because don´t like to see animals locked. Another people say that there are animals to be with humans ???, and there are animals to be in the jungle, not like pets THIS IS NOT ENGLISH. The most normal VOCABULARY pets are dogs and cats. And I agree that they can be with humans, but not in an appartament, they need a house, with a courtyard.
Some opponents say that humans are the rulers of the world so they can do whatever they want. And they don´t think in the animals. They also say that animals can´t talk so they cannot think what they want, so they do whatever they want. I really desagree SPELLING with them, if you are with a dog you can understand him GRAMMAR very well, GRAMMAR is not a human but GRAMMAR is an animal that is a very good friend to PREP us. And they WHO? have on PREP their homes snakes (in a cage), rabbits and toads, for example, just for fun.
In conclusion, although a lot of people like enjoy animals on their houses, I believe that we have to think on them. There are few exceptions, like dogs and cat, but I think that they were born to be with us. WERE THEY?
TOO SIMPLE LINKING DEVICES
If cows were de dominant species, the would eat us
Humans have a highly developed brain, capable of abstract reasoning, language, introspection, and saving problems. Animals GRAMMARnot reason or progress, they don’t solve problems they learn more or less mechanically or through the experience. Because of that cows might not be the dominant specie, so it GRAMMAR animals couldn't eat humans at first instance. BUT THE POINT IS WHETHER THEY WOULD EAT US IN CASE THEY WERE THE DOMINANT SPECIES, NOT IF THEY COULD EVER BE THE DOMINANT SPECIES.
One point of view, is that if cows were the dominant species of the planet, they would probably need more energy and sources in order to survive. So a group of people believe that maybe they would eat us. One thing to take on account is that besides needing energy, the cows would probably do what most of the humans do to survive nowadays, killing cows in order to eat meet, so probably cows would want to kill and eat humans too. This is why many people strongly believe we ought to reconsider if killing these animals is the right thing to do, because we could perfectly survive eating just vegetables.
Other point of view is that the hypothesis of the preceding paragraph is impossible because an animal can’t think or speak; there is no way to think that animals will dominate us. This idea doesn’t make sense. Animals have a lot of abilities for example there is a fact that some animals are very sensitive to sound, temperature, touch but also there is a big difference between animals and Humans.
But in my opinion, I think they would not eat us because they don’t haveTENSEthe need to. They could keep feeding themselves with the same food they eat now.
Nicolas Argerich
Adolescence: the happiest or unhappiest time in most people’s lives.
Everyone agree with the thought that adolescence is a moment of changes. Teenagers have some adult's behavior and they also have child's behavior. In general teenagers have few responsibilities, such as going to school and some other activity, and so much free time. In addition to this: in adolescence we fall in love for the first time in our lives.
There are some several advantages. Firstly, the teenagers don’t have experience of life. When they want to do something is an experiment because they don’t know how the best way is. For example, when they start to work, they do wrong the activities. Another point is that always they are dissatisfied, they are never happy, they use to want all the things that they haven't, and not to value those that they do. To sum up, they are very problematic.
However, there are many arguments against these. Firstly, teenagers don’t have economic obligations; in general parents give them a monthly payment for they to use it. Secondly, they can go out all the time with friends, their family or their love because they have lot of free time. This is incredible.
In conclusion, the adolescence is for enjoy, this moment of the life is great. The teenagers have to do their obligations and they have to enjoy the life absolutely.
By Santi Aimone